Lawyer palms over handgun proven in viral photographs of McCloskeys

Attorney hands over handgun shown in viral photos of McCloskeys

Watkins said the gun Patricia McCloskey was shown holding was not operable, and the inoperable nature of the weapon “significantly preceded” the date of the incident

CLAYTON, Mo. — The second weapon associated with the Central West End couple who pulled guns on protesters on June 28 was handed over on Saturday afternoon.

Attorney Al Watkins handed over the handgun to police outside his office in Clayton. Patricia McCloskey was pictured pulling that handgun on protesters during the June 28 incident. 

Police executed a search warrant at the McCloskey home on Friday, and took the rifle Mark McCloskey was seen holding in the photos.

RELATED: McCloskeys served with search warrant, police take rifle shown in viral pictures

Watkins said that he was no longer the counsel of record for the McCloskeys with the circuit attorney’s office, and that the criminal defense work would now be led by Joel Schwartz if any charges were brought.

Watkins said his role as counsel was compromised as he had become a potential witness in the case for keeping the handgun and handing it over to police.

Watch: Full comments from attorney Al Watkins on seizure of McCloskey guns

“It was my duty and obligation to make sure that evidence was preserved to maintain the integrity of the defense of Mr. and/or Mrs. McCloskey in the event, in the what I believe the highly unlikely event, of any charges being brought,” Watkins said.

As for why he only kept the handgun in his possession, Watkins had this to say:

“The rifle is not one I was concerned about because the rifle was, not flourished and not held in a fashion inconsistent with what Mr. McCloskey lawfully could have done in the produce department at any Schnucks. This gun (the handgun), which was not operable, and was being handled by Mrs. McCloskey, was clearly being handled in a fashion inconsistent with anyone with any sort of gun or weapon training,” Watkins said. “So the importance of having the integrity of the inoperable nature of this weapon was important given the elements of any potential crimes which may in your wildest imagination arise out of the situation which occurred on June 28 in the front yard and on the private property of the McCloskeys and Portland Place.”

Watkins said the gun Patricia McCloskey was shown holding was not operable, and the inoperable nature of the weapon “significantly preceded” the date of the incident on June 28. He also said Patricia McCloskey knew the handgun was inoperable.

5 On Your Side is not aware of any charges against the McCloskeys at this time, and the warrant served Friday evening was just for the guns.

Schwartz told 5 On Your Side Friday night he does not believe charges are warranted against the McCloskeys and that he hopes to meet with St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s office next week, but that there is no official appointment at this time.

Related Stories

RELATED: Protesters return to St. Louis area where couple drew guns

RELATED: Neighbors condemn couple who pulled guns on protesters

RELATED: Court record shows St. Louis couple pulled gun before

RELATED: Letter from neighbors condemns Central West End couple

RELATED: Couple who brandished guns at protesters say they were victims of ‘terrorism’

RELATED: ‘The only thing that stopped the crowd was my rifle’ | Interview with man who pulled out gun amid protest