Mariannette Miller-Meeks’ lawyer: Request for rejected ballots ‘regular due diligence’

Mariannette Miller-Meeks' attorney: Request for rejected ballots 'normal due diligence'

By Tom Barton, Quad-City Times

Iowa Republican Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks and her lawyer say their position has not changed in the pending election campaign in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District.

However, the couple hesitated to say whether a recent search for rejected ballots signaled a change in repeated claims that every legal ballot was counted.

Miller-Meeks’ attorney has reached out to at least six county’s accountants to request lists of rejected ballots, according to the Quad-City Times and the Iowa City press officer.

When asked if their stance that every legal vote was counted had changed, Miller-Meeks reiterated Friday that the Iowa courts, not Congress, should make such a decision.

“It’s shocking that (Rita Hart) is telling Congress to ignore Iowa laws,” Miller-Meeks told reporters on a conference call. “Iowa law and the Iowa courts are important. Iowa voters matter, and the Iowa courts should play more than a passive role in deciding who goes to Congress. … We will stand up for the Iowa law, the Iowa trial, and the Iowa voters. “

Miller-Meeks was provisionally sworn in as a new member of Congress last month after state officials confirmed the election results.

Democrat Rita Hart has asked the US Democratic-controlled House to investigate and overthrow the race, which, according to state officials, lost six votes to Miller-Meeks in all 24 counties after a nationwide recount.


Hart’s campaign identified 22 ballots that are claimed to have been legally cast but not counted due to an election error. If the 22 ballots had been counted, Hart of Wheatland would have won by nine votes.

The Miller-Meeks legal team filed a dismissal motion last month, arguing that “more than a century of precedent” required Hart to exhaust all state-level appeals before taking her case to Congress.

However, the Federal Law of 1969, under which Hart questions the election result, does not require exhaustion of all state legal challenges. The house is not necessarily bound by previous precedents, either.

Miller-Meeks attorney Alan Ostergren has argued that Hart failed to demonstrate that she was entitled to the seat, arguing that her attorneys “selected” ballots in her favor “which are routine election administration issues.” However, Miller-Meeks’ motion to dismiss did not contain any additional untold votes.

When asked if their campaign was looking for more votes in the race to ultimately be counted, Ostergren said, “Legally, we’re not there right now.”

Ostergren said the county auditors’ request for copies of rejected ballots was part of the normal “due diligence” and “ongoing process” that looks at the legal and factual claims of Hart’s campaign.

Hart’s campaign, meanwhile, argues that Miller-Meeks’ “hunt for ballots” shows that she “now agrees that there are Iowans whose votes have yet to be counted”.

By Tom Barton, Quad-City Times

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to ensure fair and accurate reporting. If you found an error or an omission in our reporting, please let us know here.

Or if you have a story idea we should investigate? Tell us here.