The dangers of hiring a household lawyer are the subject of this article. This article details the dangers of hiring a household lawyer and the negative consequences that can affect your chances of getting a favorable litigation outcome.
- Competent lawyers often cost less in the long run, as “budget” lawyers often make a “lowball” offer that does not take into account the unique facts for this particular case
While a lawyer quoting you a tempting low offer may seem attractive if you are concerned about your finances, keep in mind that in many cases, hiring a competent lawyer will cost you less in the long run. Each case has unique facts that need to be considered. Remember, a lawyer who is more proficient will generally take a lot less time because of their skills. And the less time the attorney spends on your case, the less money you will ultimately have to spend. A competent lawyer may cost you more upfront, but that can save you money in the long run.
And a lower guardian will obviously run out pretty quickly in case your litigation is lengthy and once your guardian runs out most lawyers will ask you to pay more money so they can keep working on your case.
- Knowledgeable attorneys tend to spend much less time on a case than “budget” attorneys, who often make mistakes that a competent attorney could easily have avoided
Hiring a budget attorney quoting a lowball retainer can cost you more in the long run than if you hired a more knowledgeable attorney. While the more knowledgeable attorney may need a higher guardian, they often take much less time on a case than cheaper attorneys, who tend to be less skilled than competent attorneys.
Lower initial costs seem tempting, but there is usually a reason some attorneys list a lower initial quota, and that reason may be because they’re desperate for business or you just want to “drag in” with the teaser being the lowball holder is and I hope to make up the difference with an aggressive settlement of the case.
- Competent lawyers can afford to be more selective about which clients they want to represent, while “budget” lawyers are more likely to accept any client who can both fog up a mirror and pay their “lowball” retirees
A competent lawyer can afford to be more selective about which clients to represent. Budget attorneys, on the other hand, are more likely to accept most, if not all, potential clients paying for their lowball retainer. A competent lawyer is more likely to be straightforward about your case, its strengths, and weaknesses.
- Another disadvantage of hiring a “budget” attorney is that a surprising number are not only incompetent, but also unethical
Another disadvantage of hiring a household lawyer is not only that a surprising number are incompetent, but also that some are unethical. I don’t want to belittle the legal profession as I consider it an honor to be a lawyer. I believe the majority of lawyers are both knowledgeable and honest. However, I have to point out that not all lawyers are competent or ethical. Not all budget lawyers are necessarily incompetent or unethical, but I know from years of litigation experience that a lawyer calling you a lowball retainer tends to lack either competency or ethical standards.
- Lawyers who offer “lowball” retainers often give up their clients when another case comes up that looks more lucrative or the case gets complicated
I have also noticed that some household lawyers frequently leave their clients when the case either becomes more complicated than expected or when they are presented with a different case that seems more lucrative to them. Some may feel like they have nothing to lose.
- I am aware of cases where individuals have been represented by multiple “budget” lawyers and have been in such a bad position that they have lacked the additional resources to retain a competent lawyer
There are also numerous situations that I know of that individuals have been represented by multiple household lawyers quoting lowball henchmen who not only have their case turned into a mess but their finances are so exhausted that they lack the funds required, to stay competent lawyer.
- I have also heard of cases where individuals originally retained a “budget” attorney or attorneys who treated their case so badly that they could not convince a competent attorney to represent them
Other situations that are common are cases where a person had a household attorney or lawyers who mistreated their case in such a way that they could not convince a competent lawyer to represent them. As I mentioned earlier, competent lawyers can afford to be more selective in taking cases and they are reluctant to take cases like the one just described, and even when they do, they usually cite a higher than usual deductible to make up for the case so problematic.
Make an appointment today.
Thank you for reading. Hope I could have been instructive as I tried to make my knowledge available as a free public service. Please note that all material and information on this website is general analysis and is made available to the public for general informational purposes only. These analyzes are in no way intended as specific legal advice for your particular situation. Although I am a lawyer and there is no missing signed retention and engagement letter, I am not your lawyer. There are no exceptions to this rule. In addition, do not rely on the information I am providing you as this is for your general knowledge and educational purposes only as this information would likely change based on additional facts. The transmission and reception of information on this website by third parties do not establish or establish a relationship between lawyer and client. My knowledge of the law is limited to California. Anyone who receives information on this website should not react to the information provided without first consulting a professional legal advisor licensed in their respective jurisdiction. Good luck.
Nathan Mubasher’s law firms
2621 Green River Rd, Ste 105 PMB 403
Corona, CA 92882
Tel. 1-800-691-2721 | Fax 1-310-356-3660